Archive for October, 2009

Gartner tells network administrators to “Release the Hounds”

Monday, October 19th, 2009

CNET reports that Gartner execs have told the crowd attending Gartner Symposium that it’s time to relax the network restrictions a bit:

[Gartner analysts] argu[ed] that corporate computing departments shouldn’t block social networking and that security shouldn’t completely lock down communications with the outside world. And even if information technology authorities want to shut down such activity, they can’t.

That is quite a change from IT “lock it all down” policies that I’ve seen spiraling out of control.  In my mind, it would be a welcome change. Lockdowns of corporate networks have gone past the point of annoyance into the realm of complete productivity busting. Over the last year, I’ve encountered being blocked from reading essential information regarding Linux system administration (reason: bikinis and/or lingerie. Seriously.) to being locked out of my corporate network entirely due to a password change that didn’t propagate to my maven settings (lost time: roughly four hours).

What’s amusing is, as the article says, blocking is futile.  I was able to get to the blocked Linux forum by using my iPhone.  I can do the same with social networking services.  Ditto instant messaging services that are also actively blocked. The only drawback is that is takes a bit longer.

I’ll just have to wait and see if this takes hold in the corporate world.

Chrome Frame: What’s the big deal?

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

chromeLast week, Google introduced Chrome Frame, an extension to Internet Explorer that allows Google’s Chrome browser to work inside IE. The advantage of doing that would be a much faster JavaScript engine, better rendering, plus support for HTML 5. That’s all great, but why the all the fuss? To my eye, this looks like technology for technology’s sake.

The obvious target of this is the standards-ignoring, security-threatening, bloated piece of s…oftware called IE6.  I’ve run into many instances of working for clients that MUST use IE6.  Why MUST they? Because the work in tightly-controlled PC environments, where they’re unable to download, yet alone install, any software. That would include web browsers. Some clients have had such tight security policies that they weren’t even able to control their pop up blocker settings.  These are people who have to put up with the inadequacies of IE6 because their IT department doesn’t trust them to install their own software.

I truly feel sorry for people who work in environments where they have no control whatsoever over their PC (remember that the ‘P’ stands for “Personal”).  At first, it would seem that this Chrome Frame extension would be a workaround for those stuck in IE to experience modern rendering, the fastest (maybe) JavaScript engine, and some HTML 5 goodness, but it’s not. If they’re unable to download Chrome or Firefox to replace IE, how are they going to download the Chrome Frame extension? If they do not have rights to install, how are they going to install the extension, assuming they were able to bring the extension in from home on a USB drive (although many tightly-controlled workplaces have also disabled USB drives as well)?  The answer is: they’re not.

OK, so maybe this is for people who can download and install on their own PCs, and THEY can experience the HTML 5 goodness, zippy JavaScript and fancy rendering.  What’s been stopping them? If they can freely download and install, why not just use the real deal and download and install Chrome (or Firefox) in the first place?