<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>32 Statuses &#187; ebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.32statuses.com/tag/ebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.32statuses.com</link>
	<description>The good, the bad, and the ugly of software development.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 01:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rekindled (or, &#8220;Economically feasible&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://www.32statuses.com/2010/01/rekindled-or-economically-feasible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.32statuses.com/2010/01/rekindled-or-economically-feasible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 06:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack Littleton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.32statuses.com/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Zeldman points out that there may not be enough money in e-books to properly QA the e-books; what you see on a Kindle may not be what is in the printed version of the book due to conversion errors and defects in the tools. And he&#8217;s right: A printed book is different than an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zeldman.com/"></a><a href="http://www.32statuses.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/kindle_teh.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-301" title="kindle_teh" src="http://www.32statuses.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/kindle_teh.png" alt="" width="320" height="348" /></a>Jeffrey Zeldman <a title="Kindling I" href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009/08/24/kindling/">points</a> <a title="Kindling II" href="http://www.zeldman.com/2009/08/27/kindling-ii/">out</a> that there may not be enough money in e-books to properly QA the e-books; what you see on a Kindle may not be what is in the printed version of the book due to conversion errors and defects in the tools. And he&#8217;s right: A printed book is different than an e-book in many ways. However, the differences aren&#8217;t just all negative there are positive  differences as well.</p>
<p>If a paper book is printed with errors, it stays that way. Publishers do not recall books to fix their errors, as it wouldn&#8217;t be economically feasible, just as it&#8217;s currently not economically feasible to do a full QA on e-books.  But the economies flip for correcting errors in e-books. Being software, e-books can be updated, unlike paper books, and, as a result, they can be corrected and updated in an economically feasible way. In fact, since we know <a title="Yeah, dead horse, beating. I hear you." href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html?_r=1">Amazon can do things to books without our knowledge</a>, it would be easy to update the errors in e-books on-the-fly.</p>
<p>Because some books are scanned (older books, mainly), there are scan  errors that do not go corrected (A personal experience is with Robert B.  Parker&#8217;s Promised Land, where the word &#8216;me&#8217; is substituted for &#8216;the&#8217;  liberally throughout the book). And because publishers are getting much  less revenue from e-books than printed books, they&#8217;re not interested in  applying the QA necessary to correct the errors. When print starts bringing in less revenue that e-books, watch for the error rate trend to reverse.</p>
<p><strong>Update Jan. 8, 2010</strong>: Well, this is embarassing. Yes, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/us/09brfs-RECALLOFDOIT_BRF.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">books DO get recalled</a> (source: New York Times).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.32statuses.com/2010/01/rekindled-or-economically-feasible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

